OBAMA INAUGURATED ON JANUARY 20TH ? NOT SO SURE !

Publié le par frenchpuma

Donofrio v Obama Citizenship Case Moves To New Supreme Court Level

 

 

Everybody thought that the presidential election was over...

However, new, dramatic developments in the story of Obama's ineligibilty have taken place over the last few days, and there could be some spectacular twists of events very soon...

 

 

 

The Supreme Court of the USA might play an unexpected role in this election, as it has agreed to hold closed-door hearings on a suit filed by a New Jersey resident, Mister Leo Donofrio.

The hearing will take place on December 5, 2008, ten days prior meeting of the Electoral College.

 

 

In Leo C. Donofrio v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey, retired attorney and New Jersey resident Leo. C. Donofrio asked the U.S. Supreme Court for an emergency stay on Nov. 3 prohibiting three candidates from appearing on New Jersey's ballots: Republican candidate John McCain, Democratic candidate Barack Obama and Socialist Worker's Party candidate Roger Calero.

 

Donofrio claimed the candidates are not "natural born citizens" as enumerated in Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States, which states, "No person except a natural born citizen of the United States, at the time of adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President."

He wrote, Obama is not eligible for the presidency "even if it were proved he was born in Hawaii, since … Senator Obama's father was born in Kenya and therefore, having been born with split and competing loyalties, candidate Obama is not a 'natural born citizen' …"

 

This case, unlike Phil Berg’s, does not seek to have Barack Obama provide his birth certificate. Instead it is seeking to clarify what the Founding Fathers intended when they wrote the term ‘natural born citizen’. This has never been taken up by the court.

It is true that if the court hears the case, then the result could be a review of Obama’s citizenship status.

 

 

 

 

Leo Donofrio claims that Obama is not a Natural Born citizen even if he was born in Hawaii. If you read what he has submitted to the courts you will find he believes it makes no difference WHERE he was born. If you follow the logic of his argument it appears that a person cannot be born with dual citizenship and be “natural born” because the person would have loyalty to two countries at birth…this being “unnatural”. If you take the time to follow up on what he is saying and why, it appears he could very well be correct…or not. This is what the Supreme Court should/must decide.

 

 With three ineligible presidential candidates on ballots, Donofrio warned, New Jersey voters will "witness firsthand the fraud their electoral process has become."

Leo Donofrio's case submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court regarding Obama's citizenship has reached a new level: the case has been "distributed for conference."

On December 5, 2008, only ten days before the electoral college votes, the nine Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court will meet in private to discuss this case identified as:

Leo C. Donofrio, v. Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey
United States Supreme Court Docket No. 08A407


So, after Donofrio’s case was rejected at the state level, he presented it to Supreme Court Justice David Souter who rejected it. Donofrio then presented it to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas who put it on the court docket for a conference on December 5. If four of the nine justices decide to hear the case, then full oral arguments will be scheduled.

 

the timing, 10 days before the Electoral College meets, only gives hope and ammunition for those who believe Barack Obama has conspired to create the greatest hoax in world history — that he and his family have been hiding his Kenyan citizenship since he was a few days old so he could run for President. His case is now  set for conference with all nine Justices on Dec. 5, 2008.

 

What is incredible is that Souter turned it down and Justice Thomas set it for conference. This almost unheard of.

The fact that Justice Thomas distributed the case for Conference is a rare enough occurrence. The case needs to have legal validity to get this far,

 

 

If four of the nine Justices vote to hear the case in full, oral arguments may be scheduled for the suit.

 

This is the link to the Supreme Court showing the docket and action:

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a407.htm

 

So, it looks like the Barack Obama citizenship issue will not die until he is inaugurated. It probably will not end even then.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fortunately, there are still some honest people in the USA, who are still attached to the value of their Constitution, and who are trying to publicize the story of Obama's ineligibility, largely ignored by the MSM so far.

 

More than a half-dozen legal challenges have been filed in federal and state courts demanding President-elect Barack Obama's decertification from ballots or seeking to halt elector meetings, claiming he has failed to prove his U.S. citizenship status.

An Obama campaign spokeswoman told WND the complaints are unfounded.

"All I can tell you is that it is just pure garbage," she said. "There have been several lawsuits, but they have been dismissed."

 




Every major news network, print and cable news like FOX, CNN and MSNBC, have ignored all the court cases challenging Obama's eligibility as sore losers or conspiracy theories. It might be in their best interest at this point to report this critically important meeting to take place on December 5, 2008, or lose what little credibility they have left.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This ad was published in the Washington Times National Weekly on the 17th of November. It aims at informing the public about the question of Obama's possible ineligibility.

 

A lot of Americans stil ignore the issue as the MSM has not said one word about it.

 

This ad explains : first, that Electors who will vote in the Electora College on December 15th should be sure that a candidate meets the constitutional requirements to become president before voting for him.

That is what Philip J. Berg has asked the US Supreme Court to verify.

 

Philip Berg is the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States filed a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court on October 30, 2008, requesting review of the United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge Surrick’s Dismissal of Philip J. Berg’s lawsuit against Barack H. Obama, Jr., the DNC and the other co-Defendants. Accordingly, the U.S. Supreme Court has set dates in which Barack Obama, the DNC and all co-Defendants are to respond to the Writ, which is on or before December 1, 2008.

 

 

Obama repeats he is qualified but so far he failed to prove it !

 

The ad published in the Washingtom Times invites people to action.Either the Constitution matters or it doesn’t

SEE LARGER VIEW : http://obamacrimes.com/attachments/065_Obama%20Crimes%20Ad%20-%20Wash%20Times%2020081117.pdf

 

 

The ad says that the constitutional requirements to be elected president should have been respected : so people can sign a petition to protest at :

www.ObamaCrimes.com

 

 

Why ?

 

-He may have been born in Kenya, as his paternal grandmother has said.

 

- He has not got any legal birth certificate proving he was born in Hawai. The one published on his site so far has been called a forgery by experts.

 

- He may have Indonesian citizenship as he attended school over there and Only Indonesian children could do this at that time. At school, in Indonesia, he was registered as Barry Soetoro, and his citizenship was : Indonesian ; his religion was : Islam.

 

 

 

 

   

One thing to remember :

the Constitution says that it is the "superior law of the land" : it means that this law should and does take precedence over the popular vote.

So people would have to accept that their idol is only a fraud, and is a criminal, for if he is ineligible, he is supposed to have known it from the start. It means he has deceived people ; he has taken their money, stolen it (more than 600 millions dollars !), and he has lied from the start.

The Democratic Party should be recognized guilty too, for nominating a candidate who was clearly not saying the truth about his birth and his past.

 

Barack Obama and the DNC may have violated the Constitution of the USA, and nobody speaks about it.

Everybody acts as if the whole issue had never existed, and Obama is choosing the members of his Cabinet... Whereas he may have no right to enter the WHite House !

 

 

ONE THING TO BEAR IN MIND :

 

It is now almost certain the Writ of Cert will be granted by the United States Supreme Court.

 

Accordingly, President-elect Obama will be required to tender credible proof that he is, in fact, constitutionally qualified to be sworn in as our next President. “The Rule of Law” and our United States Constitution will trump the November Presidential election results should President-elect Obama be found not to fully meet all Presidential constitutional citizenship requirements. President-elect Obama was likely born in Kenya and later through legal adoption by his mother’s second husband is still an Indonesian citizen.

 

 

During his 20s, President-elect Obama was still using his Indonesian passport to travel to foreign nations. Indonesia does not issue “dual citizenship” passports! fact Obama has ignored, not address head on, these questions relating to his birth place, citizenship and eligibility to be a President of the United States is very telling of his character. 

 

 

If the US Supreme Court requires verification, he either provides it or effectively loses the case by forfeit. He hasn’t shown himself yet to be honorable, and he’s openly criticized and incorrectly cited the constitution so he seems to have no respect for it. I would think that if he has knowingly perpetrated this fraud, he also has a plan for getting into the White House even if caught. Scary stuff !

 

 

 

The big remaining problem is :

what will be the reaction of American people :

Will they turn a blind eye to it ?

Will they revolt against those who want to discredit their idol ?

Or will they finally understand that in their haste to get rid of George Bush they have elected a fraud to the presidency ?

 

The desperation of an economically distressed but naive electorate has transcended common sense …and catapulted a dangerous character into the presidency of the USA….If the supreme court is ignored …and this whole issue is swept under the rug and buried, the USA will lose all credibility as a nation of law , order and constitutional integrity.

 

 

.

 

 

Commenter cet article